Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

1977 United States Supreme Court case
Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Argued November 29, 1976
Decided March 23, 1977
Full case nameAtlas Roofing Company, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Docket no.75-746
Citations430 U.S. 442 (more)
Opinion announcementOpinion announcement
Holding
The Occupational Safety and Health Act's right to workplace safety is a statutory public right exempt from the common law right to a trial by jury under the Seventh Amendment
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Potter Stewart
Byron White · Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun · Lewis F. Powell Jr.
William Rehnquist · John P. Stevens
Case opinion
MajorityWhite, joined by unanimous
Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution

Atlas Roofing Company, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, 430 U.S. 442 (1977), was a United States Supreme Court decision in administrative law. The decision held that the Seventh Amendment to the US Constitution did not require a jury trial to enforce the civil penalties for violating a federal "public rights" statute, allowing enforcement by an administrative agency.

Background

This case challenged the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission's administrative law proceedings

In 1970, the US Congress enacted the Occupational Safety and Health Act, which required employers to maintain safe working conditions, in response to common law negligence and wrongful death claims failing to fully protect American workers. Under the OSH Act, the federal government could pursue civil penalties against unsafe workplaces and request abatement orders to compel workplace safety reforms by arguing their case before the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC). An administrative law judge would assess questions of law and fact, and their verdict could be appealed to the full commission. Furthermore, an employer could seek judicial review of the OSHRC's decision from their court of appeals, but they would only receive a reassessment of questions of law.[1]

In 1972, the Atlas Roofing Company was fined $600 ($4370 adjusted for inflation) by the US Secretary of Labor for violating federal regulations that required roof opening covers to be securely installed, which had resulted in the death of an employee. In Atlas Roofing's appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, they argued that their right to a jury trial in common law cases under the Seventh Amendment was infringed by the OSHRC's procedure. However, the Fifth Circuit ruled that "jury trials would be incompatible with the whole concept of administrative adjudication," leading Atlas Roofing to appeal its case to the Supreme Court.[1]

Supreme Court ruling

This case was consolidated with Frank Irey Jr. v. OSHRC, a case appealed from the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit that similarly challenged whether administrative agencies could conduct their proceedings without a jury trial under the Seventh Amendment.[1]

In a unanimous opinion written by Associate Justice Byron White, the Supreme Court held that the Seventh Amendment's right of trial by jury "in suits at common law" does not apply to cases concerning public rights created through federal statutes.[2] In the Court's view, Congress' constitutional authority to enact the OSH Act's public right to a safe workplace included the ability to enforce that right through fact-finding and initial adjudication in an administrative forum, rather than a federal jury trial.[3]

To support its Seventh Amendment interpretation, the Supreme Court cited Murray's Lessee v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co., an 1856 case that recognized:

There are matters, involving public rights, which may be presented in such form that the judicial power is capable of acting on them, and which are susceptible of judicial determination, but which Congress may or may not bring within the cognizance of the courts of the United States, as it may deem proper.

— Murray's Lessee v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co., 59 U.S. at 284[4]

References

  1. ^ a b c Atlas Roofing Company v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, 430 U.S. 442 (S.Ct. 1977).
  2. ^ "Cases 'at Common Law'". Justia. Retrieved 2024-03-28.
  3. ^ United States Congress. "Amdt7.2.2 Identifying Civil Cases Requiring a Jury Trial". Constitution Annotated. Retrieved 19 September 2024.
  4. ^ Murray's Lessee v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co., 59 U.S. 272 (S.Ct. 1865).
  • Text of Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission is available from: Cornell  Google Scholar  Justia  Library of Congress  Oyez (oral argument audio) 
  • v
  • t
  • e
Right to jury trial