United States v. Davila
2013 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. Davila | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued April 15, 2013 Decided June 13, 2013 | |
Full case name | United States, Petitioner v. Anthony Davila |
Docket no. | 12-167 |
Citations | 569 U.S. 597 (more) 133 S. Ct. 2139; 186 L. Ed. 2d 139; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4541; 81 U.S.L.W. 4394 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Case history | |
Prior | 664 F.3d 1355 (11th Cir. 2011) |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Ginsburg, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan |
Concurrence | Scalia, joined by Thomas |
United States v. Davila, 569 U.S. 597 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a federal judge participates in the plea process in violation of rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a guilty plea need not be vacated if the record shows prejudice to the decision to plea due to rule 11(h).[1]
Notes
References
- United States v. Davila, 569 U.S. 597 (2013).
- Supreme Court of the United States (August 2012). "Docket for United States v. Davila".
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - United States Department of Justice (December 2012). "Reply Brief for United States v. Davila" (PDF).
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - American Bar Association (March 2013). "Amicus Brief for United States v. Davila" (PDF).
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - United States v. Davila, 664 F.3d 1355 (11th Cir. 2011).
External links
- Text of United States v. Davila, 569 U.S. 597 (2013) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Oyez (oral argument audio)
- v
- t
- e